Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Post-tensioned Garage Design Interface

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrengineer

Structural
Feb 11, 2002
157
0
0
US
I may be doing the design of a post-tensioned garage, which I have not done for some time. My intention is to have the post-tensioning supplier design both the mild and post-tensioned reinforcing for the beams and slabs, and I would do the lateral load design and column design. I am interested in any comments on this approach, and in particular would appreciate if you could provide a thumb-nail outline of how you would interface with the post-tension supplier on obtaining shears and moments for the column design. I anticipate that the post-tension supplier would be using "Adapt" and I would be using Risa-2D.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

In my opinion it would be tricky to share the design of a PT parking ramp with the supplier. It could work, but you would have to set up good channels with the supplier's PT engineer and preferably have them on staff prior to bidding the documents.

The main issue that I see you having are with the sharing of load between the columns and the PT slab. For example - the stiffer the column the more moment it takes into it, the less moment the beam has to take. And conversely, the stiffer the beam, the more moment it takes, the less moment goes into the column.

Now for straight gravity runs on square buildings this really isn't an issue because our friend the ACI allows us to assume moments of inertias for columns.

However, parking ramps typically have beams intersecting columns at locations with a short elevation change between them; which leads to very stiff columns taking very very large moments into them from the beams. These joints become a bear to detail properly.

Anyway, for your information this is how I do it:

1) Set up gravity runs with ADAPT or equal, my firm just purchased Concept, which is ramsteel's version of Floor2. (finite element analysis has become a major player in PT)

2) Set up lateral models including gravity and lateral (wind, temp and shrinkage) with Risa or equal. Input the column stiffnesses based on ACI modifiers to gross moment of intertia. Include secondary moments from ADAPT in this model - they will typically help your column design. Look for issues with columns taking too much load.

3) Take lateral loads from Risa and input into ADAPT. Watch out for the weak direction in one way systems (slab span perpendicular to beam direction).

4) "Play" between the Risa and the ADAPT models so that the moments correlate between them. At this stage remember to detail your column joints at the intersection of beams, these get conjested very quickly.

5) Pull final PT sizes onto drawings
6) Pull final column reinforcing onto drawings
7) Pull final slab rebar onto drawings.

Anyway, hope this helps. Let me know if you need more
 
agrant: I appreciate your reply. I have struggled with the issue of column design in particular, realizing that the secondary moments would help the column design as you mentioned. One of the major reasons I am hoping to have the post-tensioning supplier design the beams and slabs is the schedule we are faced with. This may be a question for the p-t supplier, but I am wondering if they could come up with a conservative estimate on a percentage basis as to how much of the load they would balance out. Then, for my RISA frames that I am using for column design, I would input the "balanced out" loads as point loads at the joints so that they would not create undue column moments, and input the remainder of the gravity load that was not balanced out as uniform loads on the beams to give the columns realistic moments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top