boffintech
Civil/Environmental
- Jul 29, 2005
- 469
Considering post-tensioning: specs call for tendons to be stressed within 7% of calculated elongation.
A calculated elongation of 2 3/4” results in a possible 7% variance of 0.1925”.
The rub: The Field Procedures Manual for Unbonded Single Strand Tendons requires that tendon elongations be measured to the nearest 1/8”. If during stressing a tendon is slightly more than 3/16” (0.1875) over the 2 3/4” it is recorded as 3”.
Since tendon measurement is rounded off to the nearest 1/8” a calculated elongation of 2 3/4” has a variance of 1/4” and a possible low of 2 1/2” and high of 3” results.
But is it really a 1/4”? If the actual elongation is measured at 3” this is 9.1% over the calculated elongation. ((2 3/4 - 3)/2 3/4) x 100 = 9.1%
The question: The calculated elongation is 2 3/4”. 7% of 2 3/4” is 0.1925. Does the 0.1925 round off to 1/8” or 1/4” to determine the low/high variance? The 7% variance of 0.1925 is closer to 1/4” than 1/8” but if 1/4” is used it technically results in a 9.1% tolerance.
Any ideas?
A calculated elongation of 2 3/4” results in a possible 7% variance of 0.1925”.
The rub: The Field Procedures Manual for Unbonded Single Strand Tendons requires that tendon elongations be measured to the nearest 1/8”. If during stressing a tendon is slightly more than 3/16” (0.1875) over the 2 3/4” it is recorded as 3”.
Since tendon measurement is rounded off to the nearest 1/8” a calculated elongation of 2 3/4” has a variance of 1/4” and a possible low of 2 1/2” and high of 3” results.
But is it really a 1/4”? If the actual elongation is measured at 3” this is 9.1% over the calculated elongation. ((2 3/4 - 3)/2 3/4) x 100 = 9.1%
The question: The calculated elongation is 2 3/4”. 7% of 2 3/4” is 0.1925. Does the 0.1925 round off to 1/8” or 1/4” to determine the low/high variance? The 7% variance of 0.1925 is closer to 1/4” than 1/8” but if 1/4” is used it technically results in a 9.1% tolerance.
Any ideas?