craigmcg
Structural
- Jan 23, 2007
- 35
I'm currently analyzing a prestressed concrete beam for the purpose of issuing repair recommendations. The as-built drawings date back about twenty-five years, and I question the logic in part of the design.
The beam in question is simply-supported with sixteen 1/2" prestressing strands on the bottom and four 1/2" strands on the top in the compression region. All strands are tensioned to 28.5 kips.
The question I have is why would somebody place prestressing strands (instead of conventional rebar) in the compression region of a simply-supported beam? My background does not include a great deal of prestressed experience, but doesn't this counteract the benefits of prestressing the bottom strands to a certain degree?
The beam in question is simply-supported with sixteen 1/2" prestressing strands on the bottom and four 1/2" strands on the top in the compression region. All strands are tensioned to 28.5 kips.
The question I have is why would somebody place prestressing strands (instead of conventional rebar) in the compression region of a simply-supported beam? My background does not include a great deal of prestressed experience, but doesn't this counteract the benefits of prestressing the bottom strands to a certain degree?