Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Proper Wingwall Design on Culverts 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

triathineer

Civil/Environmental
Apr 7, 2004
1
I am wondering what the proper technique is for designing a concrete wingwall attachment for a sloped pipe. From what I've seen and read, I have encountered 2 ways. One way is a vertical headwall with the entrance/exit slab being flat, and the other way is a vertical headwall with the entrance/exit slab matching the slope of the pipe. Can anyone give me a good direction? Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

you do need a posative slope on the apron to avoid standing water. A flatter slope will help to dissipate energy better than a steeper one. Rather than sloped, you may want to step the apron down to match the channel slope. This would keep the flow velocity lower and reduce the amount of scour that will occur at the end of your apron.
 
Haven't really ever seen a sloped apron before. All the pre-cast ones assume a flat exit, even if the incoming pipe is sloped. The actual apron isn't really that long to make much difference anyhow. all that really matters is there is a short cutoff wall, so it doesn't get undermined.
 
Is this for a road or site development?

Be careful with vertical headwalls near roads - they are severe roadside hazards. AASHTO recommends that transverse pipes over 3 ft and parallel pipes 2 ft or over have either traversable end sections or guiderail. Traversable ends are preferred.
 
CVG mentioned energy dissapation so I would recomend looking at the outlet velocity to see if "just" an apron is feasible. you may need to design a plunge basin or ?, especially if the runoff is scootin out of the culvert.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor