mechazm
Mechanical
- Jul 10, 2006
- 4
Consider a nozzle to shell attachment detail with re-pad as below sketch.
Both nozzle to pad and nozzle to shell welds are full penetration. In this sketch:
1- for re-pad to nozzle weld joint: Both t1 & t2 shall be qualified as per ASME Sec IX
2- for shell to nozzle weld joint: Both t1 & t3 shall be qualified as per ASME sec IX
I was wondering if these two joints could be behaved as one joint? in fact, is it required that the total thickness of base metal or the deposited weld metal (i.e. t2+t3) to be qualified or not.
Both nozzle to pad and nozzle to shell welds are full penetration. In this sketch:
1- for re-pad to nozzle weld joint: Both t1 & t2 shall be qualified as per ASME Sec IX
2- for shell to nozzle weld joint: Both t1 & t3 shall be qualified as per ASME sec IX
I was wondering if these two joints could be behaved as one joint? in fact, is it required that the total thickness of base metal or the deposited weld metal (i.e. t2+t3) to be qualified or not.