Deutero
Specifier/Regulator
- Jul 20, 2006
- 44
I've specified "B" deck for roof applications. Throughout the years, for FLOOR applications, I've seen B-deck specified on various plans from other engineering firms and have had it requested by contractors, due to in-stock convenience I presume. Therefore, not seeing any "red-flags", I also have specified it for floor use, whether with concrete topping or simple 3/4" deck.
After consideration, I wonder why I do not specify "C" deck which is apparently fabricated for floor apps. Further investigation shows that the two deck in question are virtually identical with the exception that they are reversed in orientation, such that the section profiles, and thus the Sp and Sn are exact opposites. With the Sp and Sn being so negligibly close, (IMO), is there any reason to change what I am specifying?
After consideration, I wonder why I do not specify "C" deck which is apparently fabricated for floor apps. Further investigation shows that the two deck in question are virtually identical with the exception that they are reversed in orientation, such that the section profiles, and thus the Sp and Sn are exact opposites. With the Sp and Sn being so negligibly close, (IMO), is there any reason to change what I am specifying?