packardresto
Automotive
- Oct 15, 2006
- 2
Does anyone know if a ribbon cellular type construction for a radiator core would reject heat differently if it were contructed using brass for the water passages and brass for the cooling fins?
I have a reproduction radiator that was made to replace one in a 1932 Packard model 901 with a 320 C.I. staight eight. This engine has a 3 3/16" bore x 5" stroke, the rated H.P. is 110. The radiator core size is 21" wide x 22 5/8" high x 2 3/4" thick. The core design is ribbon cellular, Auburn type.
Here's the issue, the original core was made using brass for the water passages with copper cooling fins between the cooling pasages. The replacement core was made using brass for the water and cooling fins.
Since the thermal conductivity of copper is 401 W/mK vs. 110 W/Mk for brass would the use of brass for the cooling fins reduce the amount of heat the radiator would reject?
The copper and brass material used in both radiators, the original and reproduction are both 0.012" thick.
Thanks for any advice.
I have a reproduction radiator that was made to replace one in a 1932 Packard model 901 with a 320 C.I. staight eight. This engine has a 3 3/16" bore x 5" stroke, the rated H.P. is 110. The radiator core size is 21" wide x 22 5/8" high x 2 3/4" thick. The core design is ribbon cellular, Auburn type.
Here's the issue, the original core was made using brass for the water passages with copper cooling fins between the cooling pasages. The replacement core was made using brass for the water and cooling fins.
Since the thermal conductivity of copper is 401 W/mK vs. 110 W/Mk for brass would the use of brass for the cooling fins reduce the amount of heat the radiator would reject?
The copper and brass material used in both radiators, the original and reproduction are both 0.012" thick.
Thanks for any advice.