vulcanhammer
Geotechnical
- Jun 17, 2005
- 138
I am currently involved in a project which involves a large (> 10,000 lb) steel sand casting for a pile driving accessory for this type of equipment:
The casting has section thicknesses of 2 1/2" and upward. It is being produced in ASTM A148 Gr. 90-60.
The end user has specified that the entire casting (which is approx. 75" x 75") be subject to radiographic testing.
My experience with this type of casting is that radiographic testing is not as effective with thick sections as, say, ultrasonic testing. But then again the ability to analyse the results has doubtless improved in recent years.
It's possible to UT the critical sections because they will be machined first (my experience is that as-cast surfaces don't UT very well, either.)
Is my thinking wrong here? In the past my experience has been to acquire castings with neither of these tests performed. But perhaps the advance in testing and data analysis techniques have changed the situation.
The casting has section thicknesses of 2 1/2" and upward. It is being produced in ASTM A148 Gr. 90-60.
The end user has specified that the entire casting (which is approx. 75" x 75") be subject to radiographic testing.
My experience with this type of casting is that radiographic testing is not as effective with thick sections as, say, ultrasonic testing. But then again the ability to analyse the results has doubtless improved in recent years.
It's possible to UT the critical sections because they will be machined first (my experience is that as-cast surfaces don't UT very well, either.)
Is my thinking wrong here? In the past my experience has been to acquire castings with neither of these tests performed. But perhaps the advance in testing and data analysis techniques have changed the situation.