Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Random Testing for Anchor Capacity

Status
Not open for further replies.

VoyageofDiscovery

Structural
Apr 7, 2002
617
Is there an Acceptance Quality Level, in percent, prescribed for mechanical or grouted anchors?

Thanks

VOD
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

5% fractile per ACI appendix D, but that may be intended for lab settings, not field results. Ask Hilti or Simpson.
 
Yes, I had checked Hilti, I noticed a sample spec from their website with regards to concrete anchors and I believe they specify a minimum of 10% (as 25% was in brackets). If one has a lot of anchors that equates to a lot of anchors to be tested.

I was hoping to find a statistical basis to reduce the number of tests with the same or better level of confidence and thus wish to use Acceptance Quality Level used in Six Sigma.

To me, 10% infers that they do not have alot of confidence with the installation process.

The anchors I need to test are not Hilti and thus I am looking for a code reference for guidance.

VOD
 
Thanks,

I looked at this document and it states the minimum sample size of 5 so it doesn't really help relate as a function of the total. I don't have ACI 355.

I notice that NYSDOT specifies that all installed anchors for my situation (for a bridge railing system) must be tested, whereas Minnesota state once used to do this in-house testing with a minimum of three.

So between Hilti, NY and Min states it appears all over the place.


Regards

VOD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor