Engimuneer said:
I will be attempting to alter the timing and possibly lowering the compression ratio for this blend.
If you go down that road, I recommend you monitor turbine inlet temperature, at least initially, to make sure you're not exceeding mfr's maximum.
If you have the ability to adjust the lambda target with long-term accuracy, you might consider enleanment as an alternative or complementary strategy for regaining knock margin.
There are many variables which play a role in defining the lean limit for a given application, but I would expect an increased ethane/methane ratio in the fuel to allow leaner lambda operation for the same limiting conditions (engine out HC; COV of IMEP). Retarding timing, reducing compression ratio, and enleanment all have the effect of retarding combustion and increasing knock margin, but enleanment typically does not have a strong upward effect on exhaust temperature.
In order to make the same peak power, any of these measures will result in higher manifold pressure; so the engine's throttle margin will be reduced accordingly. Therefore I'd recommend you monitor throttle margin, speed stability, and load acceptance if you make any of these modifications, and ensure that the engine is still able to perform as required.
I also wouldn't be surprised to see a decrease in spark plug longevity with retarded timing or higher lambda; in terms of when the required voltage at the gap [as the spark plug wears over time] exceeds the ignition system's capability. However, ethane's superior ignitability relative to methane will tend to offset the effect of higher ignition pressure [i.e. due to the above-mentioned measures]; so the jury is out on this one until you try it (or a pertinent study comes to light).
"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz