Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Reduced impact test temperature

Status
Not open for further replies.

kwaliteitshenk

Industrial
Mar 24, 2006
55
We have tested a piece of SA350 LF2 with specimen thickness of 3 mm at -40°. Now Both ASME VIII-1 and B31.3 say that our minimum design temperature should be 22.2°C higher.(-40°-22.2°= -17.8°C). In other words for a min. design temperature of -40° we should have been testing at -62.2° (-40°C minus 22.2°C).What is the reason for this reduction. It seem to me that a test specimen of 3 mm absorbs less energie than a test specimen of 10 mm at the same temperature. So when a the smaller specimen has acceptable value's a thicker also will be acceptable.

Please advise
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

It doesn't quite work like that. The thinner the test piece as compared to the actual material, the more benign (less conservative)the test because triaxiality is reduced. Therefore, some compensation in the test parameters has to be made. Some codes reduce the test temperature; some codes increase the relative energy requirements.

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
 
You must reread the Code requirements. The temperature reduction is required when the test coupon is less than 80% of the thickness of material welded.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor