Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Reducer Coupling - Dimensional Standard Help

Status
Not open for further replies.

UW1981

Mechanical
Oct 25, 2005
38
I recently ran across a threaded fitting for which I cannot find a specific ASME standard relative to the dimensional tolerances....and would like to see if any of y'all could provide some guidance.

The fitting is a "reducing coupling", this specific fitting is 2" to 1". Basically, it is a 2" threaded cap, with a 1" threaded hole cut in the top of the cap. ASME B16.11 provides dimensions for a cap...and for a coupling...but I could not find anything in 16.11 that addresses this specific type of fitting.

I guess if the wall thickness (dimension G - which is the cap wall thickness from 16.11) of this fitting is 0.5" as indicated for 3000# fitting in 16.11, the fitting is OK....but since 16.11 does not specifically address the issue of cutitng a hole in the cap, I guess I am not sure.

Any thoughts or advice as to whether this is an ASME approved fitting?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Well....I thought of that. First, 16.9 deals with welded fittings and the fitting in questions is threaded. Second, all reducers in 16.9 have a "shoulder" on them...this fitting has no shoulder. It appears to simply be a threaded cap, with a hole cut/tapped in the top. I have also checked MSS SP-95 which deals with swages...again, this does not a swage (male-large end, male-small end), this fitting is a female-large end, female-small end).
 
Is the material acceptable? Check marking/MTR.

Use it a "fab" part and do calcs. per the Code of construction.
 
deanc, thanx for the response.

I believe the material is OK (still checking, but I believe this is a Bonney Forge fitting, and their's are made of A105).

As a last resort, I could do the calcs...but was hoping for an ASME spec for this type of fitting. I have had a brief conversation with Bonney Forge and they state it complies with B16.11, but I may need to press them for their engineering calcs for this fitting (beats me having to do it!). Their drawings show it to be constructed just like a coupling as outlined in 16.11, only with one end smaller than the other.



 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor