Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Releasing moment for beams

Status
Not open for further replies.

perfectaccess

Structural
Oct 29, 2015
62
Hi community

I have moment frame resisting system,and I have couple of beam fail in shear under seismic combination ,so release the moment for that beam and it is still fail under same seismic combination,

So if it is not acting as frame ,why it fail under Semitic,

is there any interpretation please?

I used Etabs,but id doesn't matter the program,I am asking about the concept.

Thanks



 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Is it also failing in shear due to gravity loads, without seismic?

DaveAtkins
 
no I checked the gravity combination it is okey,that why I suspect this!!!!
 
Is the beam designated as a moment frame beam within the software and therefore possibly being capacity designed in shear based on the available moment capacity of the beam rather than the applied moment force?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Sounds like you are relying wholly on a computer program to work out your design.

Aside from this, what do your hand checks of the member tell you, does it still fail under the seismic case gravity load as a simply supported member, or do you get a different capacity?




 
Dear All,

The load combination which is cover
=1.2D+0.5 L+ Spectxy+Ev
And it is ordinary moment resisting frame ,so shear is not calculated based on capacity

I heard one comment in the work I didn't Understand ,and it may give interpretation to the problem,
I have been told if you want to make the beam not acting as moment resisting frame in the model you have not to release the moment in the beams(as I did), you have to release the shear in the column at the point interests with column?

Can anybody interpret why I do this?and even if this right or wrong?
 
Can you post a screen capture of one of your beam column joints showing the releases?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Hi Kootk

I upload video which is much better than picture.
combination 8-6 contain spect according to UBC97
THE problem that I release the moment,and I still have some moment and shear at the beam corner.

if anything nit clear pls let me know.
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=f254f9d0-6ba9-4c5d-865d-c03b9bc4d6c6&file=034C670D-AD92-48BE-A837-8245AE03B9C8.MP4
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor