meverett85
Aerospace
- Sep 23, 2013
- 5
Question on how to find reliability when you have two different time periods rolled up into the overall reliability requirement. I'm having a doozy of a time trying to create a reliability model for a range safety system that has multiple independent strings.
For illustrative purposes, let's say there is a requirement to be .999 reliable over a 3 hour period. Let's say the system has 3 independent strings (i.e. broadcasting transmitters). We will call them Transmitter 1 (T1), Transmitter 2 (T2), and Transmitter 3 (T3).
During phase 1 (0 to 1 hour), there is no hit against reliability as long as T3 is working along with either T1 and/or T2.
So a conditional table has 3 passing possibilities for phase 1 (0 to 1 hour):
1)T1=T2=T3 are working
2)T1 not working; T2=T3 are working
3)T1=T3 are working; T2 not working
Adding up each probability gives you R(1) for phase 1 reliability. Easy enough so far...
During phase 2 (1 to 3 hours), T2 and T3 are required however T1 is not. Here is the kicker that confuses me: What if you could repair failed transmitters during phase 1 before they entered phase 2?
I believe I need to multiply the transmitter dependability variables (MTBF/MTBF+MTTRF) so that you don't encounter a failure condition as soon as you transition from phase 1 to phase 2. There are two acceptable entry conditions into Phase 2:
1)T1(D)*T2(D)*T3(D)
2)(1-T1(D))*T2(D)*T3(D)
Adding these two values would give Dependability (D).
Now, how do I create the conditional table for phase 2?
Do you create a separate Phase 2 conditional table for each of the two passable dependability conditions above?
If so, how would you roll all of these variables up into your overall reliability for the 3 hour period?
Phase 1 Reliability (R1), Dependability (D), and Phase 2 Reliability from two different conditional tables R2 and R3....
Do you just multiply all of these together? R1*D*R2*R3? Or would it be R1*D*(R2+R3)
If this doesn't make any sense...I apologize. It's late and my head hurts!
For illustrative purposes, let's say there is a requirement to be .999 reliable over a 3 hour period. Let's say the system has 3 independent strings (i.e. broadcasting transmitters). We will call them Transmitter 1 (T1), Transmitter 2 (T2), and Transmitter 3 (T3).
During phase 1 (0 to 1 hour), there is no hit against reliability as long as T3 is working along with either T1 and/or T2.
So a conditional table has 3 passing possibilities for phase 1 (0 to 1 hour):
1)T1=T2=T3 are working
2)T1 not working; T2=T3 are working
3)T1=T3 are working; T2 not working
Adding up each probability gives you R(1) for phase 1 reliability. Easy enough so far...
During phase 2 (1 to 3 hours), T2 and T3 are required however T1 is not. Here is the kicker that confuses me: What if you could repair failed transmitters during phase 1 before they entered phase 2?
I believe I need to multiply the transmitter dependability variables (MTBF/MTBF+MTTRF) so that you don't encounter a failure condition as soon as you transition from phase 1 to phase 2. There are two acceptable entry conditions into Phase 2:
1)T1(D)*T2(D)*T3(D)
2)(1-T1(D))*T2(D)*T3(D)
Adding these two values would give Dependability (D).
Now, how do I create the conditional table for phase 2?
Do you create a separate Phase 2 conditional table for each of the two passable dependability conditions above?
If so, how would you roll all of these variables up into your overall reliability for the 3 hour period?
Phase 1 Reliability (R1), Dependability (D), and Phase 2 Reliability from two different conditional tables R2 and R3....
Do you just multiply all of these together? R1*D*R2*R3? Or would it be R1*D*(R2+R3)
If this doesn't make any sense...I apologize. It's late and my head hurts!