Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Required Minimum Copper Content 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

QANo1

Materials
Feb 27, 2015
10
Regarding minimum copper content requirements for some materials in ASME Section IIA, how does everyone interpret "when copper steel is specified?"
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Perhaps someone can offer up more information-
Some of the old tank standards have similar wording about the copper. It says "When copper-bearing steel is specified..." but doesn't say why anyone would do that.
My understanding is that it was done for increased corrosion resistance.
But I've never actually seen copper-bearing steel specified. The closest thing I have seen is use of Corten or similar generic weathering steels.
So I'm assuming that statement is a relic of years gone by.
And perhaps this is the case in the vessel industry as well.
 
The use of copper as an alloying element with mass content below 0.35% increases atmospheric corrosion resistance of steel.
 
Copper-bearing steel is far from gone. It's just often called by the trademark name: Monel.
 
I am still not understanding why this would be in the specs for mild steel materials, such as 414G, for example, if a customer could/would simply just specify a copper-bearing steel (Monel or other) if necessary for their job. I guess I could just assume that they would want the benefit of both materials combined. If that is correct, I have my answer. Like JStephen, I have never actually seen it specified. Thanks for the replies.
 
Copper bearing steel has no relation to Monel ( a nickel copper alloy). Think of copper bearing steels for use in applications where Corten would be used at somewhat lower cost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor