Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Residual connected CTs and VTs

Status
Not open for further replies.

power2020

Electrical
Aug 18, 2005
127
Anyone pl. explain the pros and cons of residual connected current and voltage transformers to detect earth faults.
Advanced thanks...
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Can you narrow down the question any at all? What is your application, how is the system grounded, what are you doing, .....?
 
Our site 11kV system has high resistance grounding system and used CBCT (Core balance current transformers) to detect the earth fault current. And 132kV system has solid ground system and here residually connected VT are used to find the earth fault (DEF).
I know residual connected CTs will be used for detecting solid ground system earth faults and CBCT will be used for detecting high resistance ground system earth faults. I would like to know the advantage of using residual connected VTs for detecting earth fault.If any specific advantage, pl. explain me
Thanking you.
 
If the 'D' in 'DEF' is directional, the residually connected VTs are the polarizing source for the directional element with the the actual tripping being done based on current. The use of voltage tells nothing (or at least very little) about where the ground fault is located; it does an excellent job of indicating that the fault does exist, somewhere.

Zero sequence voltage says there is a ground fault somewhere, zero sequence current says that the fault current is flowing through the measuring point.
 
Thank you Mr.Davidbeach. It is clear to me now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor