hotmailbox
Structural
- Dec 2, 2006
- 90
Just wanted to pick some smart brains here and see how other tackle this design problem. Please let me know if someone addressed this before. Most likely someone asked this before but I shoot it anyway.
I am dealing with retaining wall design every day (flat lots, hillsides) and I always think that using software like Enercalc or the like to design a cantilevered wall or restrained wall individually without considering the effect of adjacent return walls is too conservative. For example, a basement box 25ft x 25ft with 10ft retaining wall and if you design reinforcement and its footing as an indefinitely long wall, it's way too much.
So what I have been trying to do is:
1. Model all the walls in ETABS and apply soils loads (static and seismic).
2. Assign vertical loads from the structural above if needed.
3. Assign fixity at the base of the wall.
4. Analyze the model to get the deflection.
5. Use section cut to get design moment where needed to design reinforcement.
6. Transfer all support reactions to a SAFE file for foundation design.
7. Model footings in SAFE and assign estimated soils modulus for those footings.
8. Delete all forces in X & Y (assuming friction/passive take care of that after few checks).
9. Create non-linear uplift load cases and combo to check uplift and soils pressure.
10. Create design combos for footing design.
So far this procedure give me much more economical and aggressive design than using Enercalc or the like.
Do you see any flaws in this workflow? What would you do if you have to design a 30'wide x 50'deep house built into an existing 50% up slope hill?
I am dealing with retaining wall design every day (flat lots, hillsides) and I always think that using software like Enercalc or the like to design a cantilevered wall or restrained wall individually without considering the effect of adjacent return walls is too conservative. For example, a basement box 25ft x 25ft with 10ft retaining wall and if you design reinforcement and its footing as an indefinitely long wall, it's way too much.
So what I have been trying to do is:
1. Model all the walls in ETABS and apply soils loads (static and seismic).
2. Assign vertical loads from the structural above if needed.
3. Assign fixity at the base of the wall.
4. Analyze the model to get the deflection.
5. Use section cut to get design moment where needed to design reinforcement.
6. Transfer all support reactions to a SAFE file for foundation design.
7. Model footings in SAFE and assign estimated soils modulus for those footings.
8. Delete all forces in X & Y (assuming friction/passive take care of that after few checks).
9. Create non-linear uplift load cases and combo to check uplift and soils pressure.
10. Create design combos for footing design.
So far this procedure give me much more economical and aggressive design than using Enercalc or the like.
Do you see any flaws in this workflow? What would you do if you have to design a 30'wide x 50'deep house built into an existing 50% up slope hill?