swertel
Mechanical
- Dec 21, 2000
- 2,067
Finally, after nearly 2 years of owning the software, we are finally cutting the embilical cord on our 2D system and transitioning SWX, but what is the easiest way to maintain revision control of files without a PDM system.
We currently save the filename with the revision letter at the end of the part number. I think most people do this and it works very well. But what about references to assemblies?
For example, we have a part that is just cut blanks. It has over 90+ configurations and is currently on revision BV. Anytime we add another config (cut blank size either diameter or length), we rev the part. Nearly all of our manufactured parts reference this one part (using the Insert Base Part feature). SWX explorer could be used to rename the cut blank file to the new rev, but it doesn't find all the parts linked to the cut blank part and therefore they don't update.
We were thinking about controlling rev history only through the drawing file. The part/assembly file names would never change and thus we would not have "backup" files of old revisions. The drawing file name would continue the same procedure of having the rev letter in the filename, and the ECO's would have to be detailed enough so we could recreate old revisions if necessary. Seems like a gamble not worth taking.
Another option was to keep the current rev of the parts/assemblies without a revision letter. When we rev the drawing, we rename that file to include a revision letter and the new rev would not have the letter in its filename. That way, all assemblies and drawings always link to the same file and we maintain copies of old revisions to look at if necessary. The part/assembly models would not be totally dependent on the ECO to "retrieve" old revisions.
Personally, I think a SMALL PDM system is best, but for now is out of the question. What are your thoughts?
Scott Wertel
We currently save the filename with the revision letter at the end of the part number. I think most people do this and it works very well. But what about references to assemblies?
For example, we have a part that is just cut blanks. It has over 90+ configurations and is currently on revision BV. Anytime we add another config (cut blank size either diameter or length), we rev the part. Nearly all of our manufactured parts reference this one part (using the Insert Base Part feature). SWX explorer could be used to rename the cut blank file to the new rev, but it doesn't find all the parts linked to the cut blank part and therefore they don't update.
We were thinking about controlling rev history only through the drawing file. The part/assembly file names would never change and thus we would not have "backup" files of old revisions. The drawing file name would continue the same procedure of having the rev letter in the filename, and the ECO's would have to be detailed enough so we could recreate old revisions if necessary. Seems like a gamble not worth taking.
Another option was to keep the current rev of the parts/assemblies without a revision letter. When we rev the drawing, we rename that file to include a revision letter and the new rev would not have the letter in its filename. That way, all assemblies and drawings always link to the same file and we maintain copies of old revisions to look at if necessary. The part/assembly models would not be totally dependent on the ECO to "retrieve" old revisions.
Personally, I think a SMALL PDM system is best, but for now is out of the question. What are your thoughts?
Scott Wertel