jmme
Civil/Environmental
- Mar 9, 2011
- 25
Can someone please confirm that I am designing the ridge beam correctly for the following?
26' wide building with a metal roof with a 12:12 pitch (unobstructed, slippery slope).
The rafter span is 18.5'.
My roof snow load is 17.3 psf which I got from the following:
Pf=0.7 x Ce x Ct x I x Pg
Pf=0.7 x 0.9 x 1 x 1 x 55
Pf=34.65 psf
Ps=Cs x Pf
Ps=.5 x 35.65
Ps=17.3 psf
If I add 10psf for a dead load my ridge beam will need to carry
W=(17.3psf + 10psf) x 18.5' = 505 plf.
The ridge beam will span 12 feet.
Based on these numbers a 1-3/4" x 11-7/8" Microllam LVL will work. However, in the iLevel sizing tables for ridge beams the smallest they list is a 3-1/2" x 9-1/4". Also, when I enter in my data to iLevel Forte is tells me a 3-1/2" x 11-1/4" lvl will work.
This makes me think my calculations are wrong or missing something. Can anyone let me know if my calculations are right?
Thank you.
26' wide building with a metal roof with a 12:12 pitch (unobstructed, slippery slope).
The rafter span is 18.5'.
My roof snow load is 17.3 psf which I got from the following:
Pf=0.7 x Ce x Ct x I x Pg
Pf=0.7 x 0.9 x 1 x 1 x 55
Pf=34.65 psf
Ps=Cs x Pf
Ps=.5 x 35.65
Ps=17.3 psf
If I add 10psf for a dead load my ridge beam will need to carry
W=(17.3psf + 10psf) x 18.5' = 505 plf.
The ridge beam will span 12 feet.
Based on these numbers a 1-3/4" x 11-7/8" Microllam LVL will work. However, in the iLevel sizing tables for ridge beams the smallest they list is a 3-1/2" x 9-1/4". Also, when I enter in my data to iLevel Forte is tells me a 3-1/2" x 11-1/4" lvl will work.
This makes me think my calculations are wrong or missing something. Can anyone let me know if my calculations are right?
Thank you.