Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Risk Category - High School Career Tech, Small Schools

Status
Not open for further replies.

CBSE

Structural
Feb 5, 2014
309
What risk category should these be?

Career Tech Building - Pre-Engineered Metal Buildling. This is a building that will be used for learning welding and other trades. Total building footprint is 8,000 sqft. It will have less than 50 kids at a time. Technically it is a school, but does not meet the 250 occupant limit of the codes.

Small Schools - What should the risk category be for schools that house less than the 250 limit stated in the code? I have always defaulted to Risk Category III regardless of size.

I'm being challenged with my methodology and am sticking to my guns at this point, but if the code indirectly eludes to a Risk Category II, then that would be good to know.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

CBC/IBC table 1604.5, if you are not listed in I,III or IV, you are II. Unless the owner requires an higher risk category.
 
The ASCE risk categories are defined based on "lives at risk." They have purposely removed direct examples of what types of buildings belong in each category (i.e. warehouse, home, office, hospital, etc.) because they want you to make the determination based on how many lives are at risk given a structural failure.

If you read the chapter 1 commentary in ASCE 7-10, the methodology is explained and there is also a graph that shows the "Number of Persons at Risk" with relation to the risk category. Both the examples you mention should be RC II.
 
Okay, good information. I always got hung up by the last sentence of "Including but not limited to..."

Category II certainly reduces loading!

Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor