DEL2000
Structural
- May 10, 2004
- 48
We have a whole series of two story steel structures (5 building total), and the architect is showing a pitched roof with hips and valleys, much like is typically found by framing with gang-nailed wood trusses.
The shape of the roof just screams light gage steel trusses, but with all kinds of mechanical ductwork to design around, we want to be able to design the roof structure ourselves and have more control over the final product. Also, we have very strange bearing locations at the end of the structure, with 11 or 12' cantilevered soffited eaves, which will be more difficult with light gage steel.
With the red-iron steel option, we'll have steel beams sloping down the hips of the roof, and then bar joists bear onto those sloping steel beams. This would occur at only a couple of areas (ends of the buildings, then at the corner of the l-shaped buildings), but these areas are going to be complicated to design and build, in my mind.
So my question: Both methods we can make work, both have pluses and minuses. Our dilemna is that we have to choose one method and run with it, and be able to support that decision when the building goes into Value Engineering. I can get feasability and cost values on the light gage steel easy enough.
But for the bar joists, do any of you know what kind of a premium you pay in order to get a lot of sloped bearing seats, and quite a few bearing seats that are both sloped and skewed. Does using steel bar joists with three dimensional connections get too cost prohibitive, or is it just something they deal with. Can you call Vulcraft and get basic feasability information on a design of the roof, just enough information in order to choose which method to use?
Thanks for any gut reactions you can provide.
The shape of the roof just screams light gage steel trusses, but with all kinds of mechanical ductwork to design around, we want to be able to design the roof structure ourselves and have more control over the final product. Also, we have very strange bearing locations at the end of the structure, with 11 or 12' cantilevered soffited eaves, which will be more difficult with light gage steel.
With the red-iron steel option, we'll have steel beams sloping down the hips of the roof, and then bar joists bear onto those sloping steel beams. This would occur at only a couple of areas (ends of the buildings, then at the corner of the l-shaped buildings), but these areas are going to be complicated to design and build, in my mind.
So my question: Both methods we can make work, both have pluses and minuses. Our dilemna is that we have to choose one method and run with it, and be able to support that decision when the building goes into Value Engineering. I can get feasability and cost values on the light gage steel easy enough.
But for the bar joists, do any of you know what kind of a premium you pay in order to get a lot of sloped bearing seats, and quite a few bearing seats that are both sloped and skewed. Does using steel bar joists with three dimensional connections get too cost prohibitive, or is it just something they deal with. Can you call Vulcraft and get basic feasability information on a design of the roof, just enough information in order to choose which method to use?
Thanks for any gut reactions you can provide.