sshep
Chemical
- Feb 3, 2003
- 761
My Friends,
After a low key press release in South Africa last month, the full extent of the aftermath of a bungled turbine overspeed test at South Africa's national power company (Eskom) is becoming obvious from pictures on the internet. In a country with a serious electrical shortage, the loss of 600MW of capacity is a severe blow. The pictures tell it all.
This led to a comment from a peer that electrical overspeed protection is superior to mechanical protection because the testing can be done without actually running the turbine to the overspeed trip point. Although I agree that some components of the protection system can be tested like that (partial testing), a full test seems like it would still need to be done under actual overspeed conditions, so I am not convinced that electronic protection is fool proof either. Are there any comments on overspeed protection and testing?
best wishes,
sshep
After a low key press release in South Africa last month, the full extent of the aftermath of a bungled turbine overspeed test at South Africa's national power company (Eskom) is becoming obvious from pictures on the internet. In a country with a serious electrical shortage, the loss of 600MW of capacity is a severe blow. The pictures tell it all.
This led to a comment from a peer that electrical overspeed protection is superior to mechanical protection because the testing can be done without actually running the turbine to the overspeed trip point. Although I agree that some components of the protection system can be tested like that (partial testing), a full test seems like it would still need to be done under actual overspeed conditions, so I am not convinced that electronic protection is fool proof either. Are there any comments on overspeed protection and testing?
best wishes,
sshep