I have to ask "why are using a rupture disc rather than a PRV?" Latexman's response is correct, and with an RD, once it bursts you are losing whatever the material is until the pump is stopped, they don't re-seat like a PRV. More detail might help us give responses that are not straight from the textbook.
Generally speaking installing a RD seems like a bad idea to me in such a location.
Normally you install a RD when a Relief valve cannot act fast enough to prevent failure, e.g. on the low pressure side of a shell and tube HX to cope with a tube failure.
Why you need on on the outlet of a PD pump which needs to have a relief valve to cope with blockage of flow is not clear.
As noted RDs don't like pulsations or transients. They are a purposely weakened part of the system.
Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
RD's will reliably burst when they need to burst - and they'll reliably burst when they're not needed. That's especially true in a liquid-full system, and it's exponentially true for applications like the discharge of a pulsating pump. That's an exceptionally bad application for an RD.
For good operational reliability and safety, default to using reclosing devices (PSVs) in all cases, except for the relative few cases where there's a specific reason to use an RD.
