MDDSI
Chemical
- May 12, 2017
- 8
Picture attached.
I am posting here because I am at wits end on how to handle this situation. My company often deals with large flat surfaces that are subject to typically low pressures (approximately 1 psi). In the past, a stiffening rib has been added to the surface to help rigidity - usually a flat bar welded directly to the vessel skin. Recently, a new design has been suggested, one where a large section of the flat bar is removed or "scalloped". One argument for this design is that it utilizes less steel and reduces the welds needed. If this "beam" were to be attached to a plate, the beam stress would then be shifted from a uniformly distributed load to a series of point loads, so in theory, this unit should work just fine. However, something doesn't smell right to me. I cant help but feel like there is more that needs to be analyzed with this design. I have seen some guidance for putting holes in the web of I beams, and castellated beams, but this is slightly different as the cut outs are not midspan on the web. I would argue that by welding the rectangular section to the plate it makes a sort of T section, where the scallops are right against the T sections flange.
Overall, this design bothers me, though I have not been able to fully justify why, and perhaps my concerns are unnecessary. Using beam theory to work this out seems to be the logical path forward, but again, I think there is more to it. Do any of you have a recommended resource for attempting to analyze this member or is this so out of the ordinary that there really is not a reliable method? Please let me know if I can further explain my question.
Thanks
I am posting here because I am at wits end on how to handle this situation. My company often deals with large flat surfaces that are subject to typically low pressures (approximately 1 psi). In the past, a stiffening rib has been added to the surface to help rigidity - usually a flat bar welded directly to the vessel skin. Recently, a new design has been suggested, one where a large section of the flat bar is removed or "scalloped". One argument for this design is that it utilizes less steel and reduces the welds needed. If this "beam" were to be attached to a plate, the beam stress would then be shifted from a uniformly distributed load to a series of point loads, so in theory, this unit should work just fine. However, something doesn't smell right to me. I cant help but feel like there is more that needs to be analyzed with this design. I have seen some guidance for putting holes in the web of I beams, and castellated beams, but this is slightly different as the cut outs are not midspan on the web. I would argue that by welding the rectangular section to the plate it makes a sort of T section, where the scallops are right against the T sections flange.
Overall, this design bothers me, though I have not been able to fully justify why, and perhaps my concerns are unnecessary. Using beam theory to work this out seems to be the logical path forward, but again, I think there is more to it. Do any of you have a recommended resource for attempting to analyze this member or is this so out of the ordinary that there really is not a reliable method? Please let me know if I can further explain my question.
Thanks