Ken_C
Mechanical
- Aug 29, 2018
- 11
we are trying to model a vessel designed and built in 1974 so we can assess if a higher SG fluid can be used. Applying current Section VIII, Div. 1 code edition software a portion of the vessel shell fails (significantly) at the original design condition (before we bumped up the fluid SG). Before we hone in on operator error, has the methodology changed since 1974 used to determine shell thickness?
Also, the material used is SA-387-C (annealed), which based on my research is the current SA-387, Gr. 11, Cl. 1. The temperature is 1010F. Could the allowable stress have changed since 1974 to cause the software to show shell failure?
Note that without getting into lots of details that other smaller diameter portions of the shell (<=138" dia) are OK...it's the large diameter portion (144" dia.) that fails.
Thanks for your time!
Also, the material used is SA-387-C (annealed), which based on my research is the current SA-387, Gr. 11, Cl. 1. The temperature is 1010F. Could the allowable stress have changed since 1974 to cause the software to show shell failure?
Note that without getting into lots of details that other smaller diameter portions of the shell (<=138" dia) are OK...it's the large diameter portion (144" dia.) that fails.
Thanks for your time!