Nice summary sheet- thanks for sharing.
I've always just taken the numbers on the penetrometer shaft multiplied by one hundred as an approximation of the allowable bearing pressure- no point in being meticulous with a probe that only penetrates a quarter inch deep!
Then again; I've only ever used my pocket penetrometer to confirm what I already know- it takes care to apply the data in isolation. From my experience, the "allowable bearing pressure" (I hate the term, it's wickedly vague) derived from the pocket penetrometer is often very different from that obtained empirically from a dynamic cone penetrometer. So if you were to run both tests, and perhaps a couple others just to complicate things further, your correlation would probably be weak and you'd end up cherry-picking your result anyway!
Cheers,
Mike