Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations The Obturator on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Self-energizing O rings 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

nachocivicos

Chemical
Aug 30, 2008
7
Hi,

In case of Self-energizing O-rings, strante behaviour appears when comparing integral and loose type flanges (ASME VIII, Div.1, Mandatory App. 2), calculated thickness for loose-type (sketch 4a) appear to be lower than for integral-type (sketch 7). How is it possible? I believed thickness for integral-type would always be lower than those for loose-type, when maintaining all other dimensions and materials. Any help?

Regards,
J.I.G.C.
Chemical Engineer
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you


Check your calculations with paragraph 2-7 (formulas for calculating intergral and loose flange stresses). The Radial flange stress of the intergal type will lower it's Tangential stress versus the loose type.
 
nachocivicos, I would also add to be sure you are treating the various dimensions properly, see the relevant figures in APX 2.

Regards,

Mike
 
Thank you very much for your help!

After reviewing calculations, I am not sure of which "h" value to use regarding sketch (7); I have noticed final thickness strongly depends on this parameter, which was previously advised to me to be taken as equal to weld leg. But after this advice I am afraid the same question remains,re-formulated: which "h" value should apply? The problem mentioned arose when using the "minimum 6 mm" value stated in the specific note on sketch (7).

Best regards, and thank you again,
J.I.G.C.
Chemical Engineer
 
nachocivicos, for this slip-on, integral type flange "h" (the weld leg) is the larger of 1/4 of the cylinder thickness (go) or 1/4" (6 mm). g1 is the combined thickness of the cylinder and weld leg.

This is easily determined from the sketch.

Regards,

Mike
 

If the nozzle wall(go) is 24mm or less h is 6 mm minimum.

Say the nozzle wall is 32 mm an 8mm minimum h is required.

 
nachocivicos,
Also, keep in mind unless you are machining a step or relief in the flange face so there is no metal-to-metal contact outside the bolt circle, you are not allowed to use Appendix 2 (see 2-1(a) Scope. O-ring flanges usually belong in Appendix Y and this is often misapplied.

You would have to calculate per Appendix Y, which is not a bad thing. If you do have a machined relief, you are OK with Appendix 2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor