Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Shear Transfer across Vertical Construction Joint

Status
Not open for further replies.

asixth

Structural
Feb 27, 2008
1,333
Hi

When transferring a large shear force across a vertical construction joint, is the ACI shear friction method an appropriate shear model for design.

I have compared different scenarios using the shear model for beams and have found that a typical situation (0.25% flexural reo and Asv/s=4.52) I can get a shear capacity of 1.7N/mm^2 (roughly 0.04*f’c).

When using the shear friction model, if I load the cross-section full of reo so that I have 1% reinforcement crossing the shear plane I can get a shear capacity of 3.0N/mm^2. It does not seem intuitive to me that I can get more shear capacity thru dowel action than by a monolithic section.

Also, is the shear friction method only applicable if the dowels are located in the compression zone of a suspended slab?

This has all come about from a terrible detail where I am attempting to transfer a large shear force across a vertical construction joint in a suspended slab (at least for now, I have a feeling that I will be relocating the construction joint).

All input will be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You will get different opinions on this, but I would never use shear friction for a vertical construction joint. And I don't see why if would be applicable at all with the dowels in the compression zone, as the shear friction concept is that the steel provides a clamping force, while in the compression zone, you already have clamping due to flexure. When I use dowels (big ones) to transfer load by bearing, I put them at mid-depth, because that lessens the chance of breakout.
 
Agree with hokie. I don't really like dowels for "large" shear transfer either, would prefer a slip bearing connection for "large" shear forces, but this statement would all depend one what is considered large.

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
 
Hi guys,

Do you guys spend your saturday's keeping up with eng-tips?

It's large, V*/(b*D) is 2.3N/mm^2 if it where a monolithic section. I'm not going to run the gautlet and just re-locate the joint. They won't like it but I don't care.

Thanks for the help.
 
450t if you want to put a number to it!! It's got me scared.
 
I remember reading something that RAPT wrote a while ago regarding bottom dowels in punching shear reinforcement that were shown to help delay the onset of punching. I thought that maybe the dowels being thru the compression zone may help with the shear design.
 
For that sort of load... I'd be looking at putting a real bearing connector in place...

Dik
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor