Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Smath broken again

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sparweb

Aerospace
May 21, 2003
5,109
I've been using Smath (not entirely voluntarily) for a couple of years now.

Some of the sheets I've written in the past are now broken after a recent update and I'm completely stumped about the reason why.

Has anyone encountered problems getting a formula to solve with units being present, and canceled, within an exponent?

Normally, in an exponent, there cannot be any units. So 10^[sup]3.4[/sup] is fine (for obvious reasons) and 10^[sup](3.5*ft)[/sup] is bad, but 10^[sup](3.4*ft/2*ft)[/sup] should also be fine.
At least, it was...

I have rewritten the equation from scratch, I have created an intermediate variable to "hold" the value of the exponent before using it in the exponential equation, AND confirmed that the units are canceled before being used in that equation. AND I have written the equation as unitless numbers to confirm that the value can be found. But this is not automatic. It only works by manually over-typing the value.

I use Smath because it can include units in calculations. Including units in formulas is the WHOLE POINT of bothering with this semi-OK software, otherwise I would just use Excel or Python or MSWord. Losing the functionality of putting variables into exponents would seriously hamper any further interest in Smath. This is the 3rd time in 2 years that I've updated Smath to find it breaks some function that I use extensively.

I can't share a copy of the proprietary file. If absolutely necessary, I may be able to "trim" it to just the broken pieces.


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

SMath is actively developed.

Contact the developer directly and it will get fixed.

In the meantime, revert to a prior version where this worked.
 
another hiccup... I used to use a common variable name for arrays with a common index name and declare the variable names as different when extracting them from the array... using the same name and index for the next array, with different variable names would give correct results. With the new re-write, it retains the previous array variable information.

image_muoorw.png


lam used to have the name 'base' and lam[sub]ndx[/sub] used to be base[sub]ndx[/sub] for all variables...

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik
 
I agree with @MintJulep's advice: contact the developer directly or through the SMath forums.
 
A new version of SMath just came out today...

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik
 
Smath is still broken.

I have a verbal agreement in place with my department manager that next year's budget for software can be used for Mathcad. Not solved yet but maybe the end is in sight.

 
Is PTC still shipping the old version of Mathcad so people can get some work done?
 
Mathcad might be almost dead but Mathcad 15 is still a great program, one that I use every day. I have a stand alone version that gets re-installed everytime I get a new computer or hard drive. I've tried Prime a few times, but I am not ready for it just yet. I've tried SMath a few times but again, I'm not ready for it yet. Mathcad 15 is just too comfortable, too easy, and it does units so well...
 
Every new version of Mathcad got progressively slower to load, so M14/M15 are ideal for me. I think Mathcad Prime has finally gotten close to the functionality that existed in M15.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
Yes Mathcad 15 it great....and it works as long as it runs...

I grew up with Mathcad....forgot what my first Version was...some 25 years ago ...??

But what I can see the last years Mathcad is at the end of development and maintenance :(
 
But what I can see the last years Mathcad is at the end of development and maintenance :(

Still working new versions: They should be really close to what M15 provided, but with a much cleaner interface and better graphing. They supposedly have a new symbolic engine, but I've not been using MP except to open other people's worksheets.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
Mathcad Prime is under 'development' since many many years ... not sure if anybody is usung it
Also I think it will be quite expensive to use .... :(
I think for the ordinary daily engineering work SMATH will be the better option ... but only my opinion
 
There are features of MP that interconnect with PTC's ME software, allowing the ability to do parametric design/analysis, which is something that MC11(?) was attempting to do with MathConnex and some other CAD program that had that parametric design/analysis

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor