zappedagain
Electrical
- Jul 19, 2005
- 1,074
I have a system where I'm receiving pulses and I'd like to quantify the signal to noise ratio for the pulse.
Are there any standards calculations for determining the signal to noise ratio of a pulse? In a CW (continuous wave) system I'll take the ratio of the RMS (root mean square) voltage of the signal and divide it by the noise (also in RMS).
If I do this for a pulse, I have to throw some assumption in for the repetition of the pulse; a pulse with a slower repeition rate will have a lower RMS value than a pulse with a faster repetition rate. That make sense for a continuous time system, but not for an aquisition system with a fixed time window.
For example, i have two systems that measure the pulse. One collects data for 10 times the duration of the pulse and the other system collects data for 40 times the duration of the pulse. They both measure the same pulse, but one reports a RMS value 4x what the other reports.
I could measure the RMS is a fixed window around the pulse to eliminate this variation but that gets a bit too application specific and could introduce error if my fall time slows down. Is there a standard technique that I'm missing?
Another technique would be to divide the rms value by the acquisition window width. That will give me a constant value in Vrms/sec; strange units though and a quick test didn't give me the results I expected...
Can anyone recommend any good books on pulse analysis?
Are there any standards calculations for determining the signal to noise ratio of a pulse? In a CW (continuous wave) system I'll take the ratio of the RMS (root mean square) voltage of the signal and divide it by the noise (also in RMS).
If I do this for a pulse, I have to throw some assumption in for the repetition of the pulse; a pulse with a slower repeition rate will have a lower RMS value than a pulse with a faster repetition rate. That make sense for a continuous time system, but not for an aquisition system with a fixed time window.
For example, i have two systems that measure the pulse. One collects data for 10 times the duration of the pulse and the other system collects data for 40 times the duration of the pulse. They both measure the same pulse, but one reports a RMS value 4x what the other reports.
I could measure the RMS is a fixed window around the pulse to eliminate this variation but that gets a bit too application specific and could introduce error if my fall time slows down. Is there a standard technique that I'm missing?
Another technique would be to divide the rms value by the acquisition window width. That will give me a constant value in Vrms/sec; strange units though and a quick test didn't give me the results I expected...
Can anyone recommend any good books on pulse analysis?