Teamdesign
Structural
- Sep 10, 2012
- 9
Dear all,
UK based project which baffles me the last few months (years of design experience in mainly residential works and this is the first with such issue)
A new build single rear storey extension of say 2.50m wide x 10m in length (build within the past 6months) has sudden minor sinking only at one outer corners.
Brick and block cavity wall say 12kN/m line load on foundation. Ground bearing rc floor slab.
15-20m away there is a row of mature horse chestnut trees.
New foundation is 0.60m wide x 1.0m deep concrete on stiff to firm clay. (100-150kN/m2 SBC) Plasticity index @ 25% ie. medium plasticity
I've considered latest design guidelines based on the trees location, plasticity index (I took higher percentage) to new foundation and design tables come back as 1.0m being OK!
Existing main 2 storey house foundation is shallower with no evidence of subsidence.
Builder did not tie new foundation to existing foundation with 16-20mm dowel bars as per good practices.
I am no geotechnical, but think it is a soft spot and I've recommended underpinning the corner increasing substantially to a wider and deeper footing and making good.
The client house insurance company hires subsidence surveyors (not geotechnical) who claims the foundation is not designed correctly
and the whole extension should be rebuild on 1.60 to 2.0m deep foundation.
Comments please
Thank you for your time!

UK based project which baffles me the last few months (years of design experience in mainly residential works and this is the first with such issue)
A new build single rear storey extension of say 2.50m wide x 10m in length (build within the past 6months) has sudden minor sinking only at one outer corners.
Brick and block cavity wall say 12kN/m line load on foundation. Ground bearing rc floor slab.
15-20m away there is a row of mature horse chestnut trees.
New foundation is 0.60m wide x 1.0m deep concrete on stiff to firm clay. (100-150kN/m2 SBC) Plasticity index @ 25% ie. medium plasticity
I've considered latest design guidelines based on the trees location, plasticity index (I took higher percentage) to new foundation and design tables come back as 1.0m being OK!
Existing main 2 storey house foundation is shallower with no evidence of subsidence.
Builder did not tie new foundation to existing foundation with 16-20mm dowel bars as per good practices.
I am no geotechnical, but think it is a soft spot and I've recommended underpinning the corner increasing substantially to a wider and deeper footing and making good.
The client house insurance company hires subsidence surveyors (not geotechnical) who claims the foundation is not designed correctly
and the whole extension should be rebuild on 1.60 to 2.0m deep foundation.
Comments please
Thank you for your time!
