Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

SOIL BEARING FOOTING PRESSURES

Status
Not open for further replies.

cap4000

Civil/Environmental
Sep 21, 2003
555
Can someone explain why the difference between these two methods. The first one is the typical 2V:1H with the Boussinesq pressure isobars. Between them there seems to be large pressure differences for both Spread and Continuous Footings.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

What are you doing with them?

[pacman]

Please see FAQ731-376 by [blue]VPL[/blue] for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 
In response to the Focht3 question. I am trying to figure lateral pressures from spread and column footings against existing foundation walls at varying depths.
 
Then use Boussinesq or Westergaard - the 2:1 distribution is for estimating vertical pressures only. Poulos and Davis' book includes solved equations, as well as charts, for evaluating the lateral pressures.

By the way, were the pressures you calculated using the 2:1 approach about twice as high as those from Boussinesq?

[pacman]

Please see FAQ731-376 by [blue]VPL[/blue] for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 
Poulos and Davis is a great reference (Elastic Solutions for Soil and Rock) and should be in everyone's library. Newmark has a lateral load chart you can use. I'll have to confirm, but for surcharge loadings on non-yielding walls (footing near the wall but founded "high up") which you might have, the lateral pressures are, I believe, to be doubled. I'll try to confirm this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor