Nosey
Chemical
- Feb 2, 2003
- 43
Mature oil & gas fields inevitably produce sand along with the hydrocarbons and water. These sand particles result in a multitude of problems, one of which is erosion of 90° elbows. Standard practice is to install "Target Tees" at these point.
The blind on the tee generally has a lead (or other soft metal) insert to "absorb the impact of the particles". Over time the dead leg of the tee accumulates sand and this prevents erosion of the pipe fitting itself.
Recently I have heard extensive debate on the usefulnes of Target Tees and whether or not Long Radius Elbows should be employed instead.
Whilst LR elbows are subjected to the same amount of erosion as short radius elbows the depth of penetration is less due to the larger surface area [SPE 38842 - Solid Particle Erosion in LR Elbows and straight pipe, 1997, McLaury et al]
I have come across both LR and Target Tees in severe sand duty, but have neither has established itself over the other with the exception that LR Elbows are easier to monitor with UT.
Obviously the flow regime will have a large effect upon the rate of erosion. At the moment I am looking solely at single phase (erosion) pipework.
Does anybody out there have experience (old war stories) on this matter or comments?
The blind on the tee generally has a lead (or other soft metal) insert to "absorb the impact of the particles". Over time the dead leg of the tee accumulates sand and this prevents erosion of the pipe fitting itself.
Recently I have heard extensive debate on the usefulnes of Target Tees and whether or not Long Radius Elbows should be employed instead.
Whilst LR elbows are subjected to the same amount of erosion as short radius elbows the depth of penetration is less due to the larger surface area [SPE 38842 - Solid Particle Erosion in LR Elbows and straight pipe, 1997, McLaury et al]
I have come across both LR and Target Tees in severe sand duty, but have neither has established itself over the other with the exception that LR Elbows are easier to monitor with UT.
Obviously the flow regime will have a large effect upon the rate of erosion. At the moment I am looking solely at single phase (erosion) pipework.
Does anybody out there have experience (old war stories) on this matter or comments?