Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

SpaceX Comm/Facebook Satellite toast. 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

itsmoked

Electrical
Feb 18, 2005
19,114
yahoo News, includes a movie


ice_screenshot_20160901-172552_om7oxi.png




Keith Cress
kcress -
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

So, is it too much of a weight penalty to put a capsule-lauch emergency booster on the satellite capsule for such a test?

If the static test is satisfactory, then you unbolt and remove the safety rocket before the real launch. Or leave it on the capsule to recover the satellite if the main rocket goes off at the real launch.

Or, after a few seconds of flight, use the thrust from the emergency rocket to add a few lbs of thrust while in flight. Then eject the empty safety rocket.
 
The fairing over the satellite isn't much more than a dome, designed to resist aerodynamic pressures only.
Attaching an escape tower on top of it (a la mercury capsule) would require substantial reinforcement of the fairing to allow it to support the weight of the satellite multiplied by the lift-off acceleration of the escape rockets. That will be many more times the load the fairing can handle without substantial reinforcement.
And then there's the matter of landing the escaped capsule safely...
This is complex and expensive enough that I think it's only been justified for capsules carrying humans.

STF
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor