EngineerRam
Structural
- Jul 31, 2014
- 50
Hello,
When designing special shear walls with no boundary elements (i.e. reinforcement at ends is not confined), do you consider the contribution of the end reinforcement in compression to the flexural capacity of the wall? The reason I am asking is because making or not making this assumption can be unconservative depending on the case:
1) If I disregard the end reinforcement in compression, my flexural capacity of the wall is reduced. If I design the wall similar to an SMF column (i.e. utilizing the fi factor of 0.75 for the ductile limit state and 1.25fy), the design shear associated with the flexural capacity is reduced.
2) If I include the end reinforcement in the flexural capacity, my flexural capacity is increased, although I am not confined by ties to be able to use this reinforcement in compression from my interpretation of the code.
Thanks
When designing special shear walls with no boundary elements (i.e. reinforcement at ends is not confined), do you consider the contribution of the end reinforcement in compression to the flexural capacity of the wall? The reason I am asking is because making or not making this assumption can be unconservative depending on the case:
1) If I disregard the end reinforcement in compression, my flexural capacity of the wall is reduced. If I design the wall similar to an SMF column (i.e. utilizing the fi factor of 0.75 for the ductile limit state and 1.25fy), the design shear associated with the flexural capacity is reduced.
2) If I include the end reinforcement in the flexural capacity, my flexural capacity is increased, although I am not confined by ties to be able to use this reinforcement in compression from my interpretation of the code.
Thanks