jray2900
Structural
- Jun 27, 2014
- 4
The question has recently been raised at my company if the way that we are running our analyses using Staad Pro V8i is compliant with the AISC 14th Chapter C requirements for stability. Just to give a little background, I work for a company that designs and builds low occupancy industrial structures. I've been trying to find some relevant information of how to use DAM in staad but I haven't had any luck finding anything readily available on online. I am looking to get a little insight on the way we are using staad to design structures and if this method is sufficient to satisfy code requirements.
Below is an example of the code check section of a generic staad file:
-----------------------------------------------------
PDELTA 3 ANALYSIS SMALLDELTA PRINT ALL
PARAMETER 1
CODE AISC UNIFIED
METHOD LRFD
FYLD XXX
LY XXX
LZ XXX
RATIO XXX
STEEL TAKE OFF XXX
CHECK CODE ALL
----------------------------------------------------
Some guidelines we follow:
We always use repeat loads
New construction and newer existing structures are always analyzed using LRFD
Older existing structures are always ASD
Unity Ratios:
Columns < 0.75
Beams < 0.85
Bracing < 0.9
Anything with moving equipment < 0.5
It is our standard practice to be quite conservative with loading and deflections because of the magnitude of some of the equipment that we use in our designs. Thank you for any comments or advice.
Below is an example of the code check section of a generic staad file:
-----------------------------------------------------
PDELTA 3 ANALYSIS SMALLDELTA PRINT ALL
PARAMETER 1
CODE AISC UNIFIED
METHOD LRFD
FYLD XXX
LY XXX
LZ XXX
RATIO XXX
STEEL TAKE OFF XXX
CHECK CODE ALL
----------------------------------------------------
Some guidelines we follow:
We always use repeat loads
New construction and newer existing structures are always analyzed using LRFD
Older existing structures are always ASD
Unity Ratios:
Columns < 0.75
Beams < 0.85
Bracing < 0.9
Anything with moving equipment < 0.5
It is our standard practice to be quite conservative with loading and deflections because of the magnitude of some of the equipment that we use in our designs. Thank you for any comments or advice.