FEMbiaatch
Mechanical
- Nov 29, 2021
- 5
Hello,
I am running a quasi-static analysis of medical needle penetration into a thermoplastic polyurethane material (0.4mm thick) using cohesive zone modeling in Abaqus Explicit solver.
The whole analysis will last for 3 seconds. The problem is that my stable time increment is very small. It is 8.14e-9 seconds. I'm using a visco-hyperelastic material model for the polyurethane calibrated using experimental measurements, and my needle is modeled to be rigid. I know that the smallest element length affects Abaqus's stable time increment algorithm, but I'm using a reasonably coarse mesh. From the preliminary examinations using verify mesh, it seems that I can't increase the stable time increment beyond 1e-9 seconds for my chosen material properties. Mass scaling does improve the time increment but not that substantial. Is there any other way to increase stable time increment?
Thank you.
I am running a quasi-static analysis of medical needle penetration into a thermoplastic polyurethane material (0.4mm thick) using cohesive zone modeling in Abaqus Explicit solver.
The whole analysis will last for 3 seconds. The problem is that my stable time increment is very small. It is 8.14e-9 seconds. I'm using a visco-hyperelastic material model for the polyurethane calibrated using experimental measurements, and my needle is modeled to be rigid. I know that the smallest element length affects Abaqus's stable time increment algorithm, but I'm using a reasonably coarse mesh. From the preliminary examinations using verify mesh, it seems that I can't increase the stable time increment beyond 1e-9 seconds for my chosen material properties. Mass scaling does improve the time increment but not that substantial. Is there any other way to increase stable time increment?
Thank you.