123MB
Electrical
- Apr 25, 2008
- 265
Hello all mechanical people! This is my first post in the area. I am an Electrical guy, but I hope we can be friends.
We are designing an outdoor electrical enclosure containing a brake resistor which generates lots of heat. I have estimated, based on thermal rise (buoyant flow) calculations that the interior of the enclosure will be around 100 deg C.
The intention is to provide natural ventilation for the enclosure which is designed to take advantage of the temperature differential between inside and outside through the stack effect.
The enclosure is designed as follows:
1) 800Hx400Wx400D mild steel
2) Ventilation inlet opening at the bottom of the enclosure, mounted on one side, 400Hx200W covered with 2.1mm aperture mesh and protected by a rain hood.
3) Outlet opening in the roof of the enclosure, 400Wx400D covered with 2.1mm aperture mesh.
My question is: what is theoretical optimum size ratio between the inlet and outlet openings to maximize natural ventilation and cooling for the enclosure.
I have done lots of research online and read research papers, some say the inlet and the outlet should be the same size and others say different.
At the moment we have sized the outlet at 150% of the cross sectional area of the inlet as we have been advised to do so in order to maximize natural ventilation and cooling, but I do not understand why this is and I would like to understand this further.
I understand that a smaller inlet opening with a larger outlet opening should increase the velocity of air being sucked into the enclosure, but I don't see how this improves cooling as the volumetric flow rate is the same as what would be achieved with a larger inlet opening and lower air velocity.
I also understand that sucking the air in at a higher velocity creates a lower pressure area at the bottom of the enclosure. Does this effectively increase the differential pressure between inside and outside, resulting in more air being sucked in?
Essentially I am after some justification for sizing the inlet opening smaller than the outlet opening, otherwise I am concerned that from a common sense point of view it doesn't make sense and in that case we will probably just make them the same size.
Thanks.
We are designing an outdoor electrical enclosure containing a brake resistor which generates lots of heat. I have estimated, based on thermal rise (buoyant flow) calculations that the interior of the enclosure will be around 100 deg C.
The intention is to provide natural ventilation for the enclosure which is designed to take advantage of the temperature differential between inside and outside through the stack effect.
The enclosure is designed as follows:
1) 800Hx400Wx400D mild steel
2) Ventilation inlet opening at the bottom of the enclosure, mounted on one side, 400Hx200W covered with 2.1mm aperture mesh and protected by a rain hood.
3) Outlet opening in the roof of the enclosure, 400Wx400D covered with 2.1mm aperture mesh.
My question is: what is theoretical optimum size ratio between the inlet and outlet openings to maximize natural ventilation and cooling for the enclosure.
I have done lots of research online and read research papers, some say the inlet and the outlet should be the same size and others say different.
At the moment we have sized the outlet at 150% of the cross sectional area of the inlet as we have been advised to do so in order to maximize natural ventilation and cooling, but I do not understand why this is and I would like to understand this further.
I understand that a smaller inlet opening with a larger outlet opening should increase the velocity of air being sucked into the enclosure, but I don't see how this improves cooling as the volumetric flow rate is the same as what would be achieved with a larger inlet opening and lower air velocity.
I also understand that sucking the air in at a higher velocity creates a lower pressure area at the bottom of the enclosure. Does this effectively increase the differential pressure between inside and outside, resulting in more air being sucked in?
Essentially I am after some justification for sizing the inlet opening smaller than the outlet opening, otherwise I am concerned that from a common sense point of view it doesn't make sense and in that case we will probably just make them the same size.
Thanks.