ConstantEffort
Mechanical
- Dec 29, 2012
- 72
A client wishes to use RTJ on CL900 systems in both 304SS and 316SS. The gaskets are to match the metallurgy of the line, so I've got two 304SS flanges squeezing a 304SS gasket. Ditto for 316.
My concerns are...
304SS and 316SS ring gaskets apparently are available at a max hardness of Rockwell-B 83 or Brinnell 160. (
ASTM A182 does not directly control hardness on F304 or F316. ASME B16.5 is no help on hardness either.
My limited understanding of gasket sealing is that the soft gasket should plastically deform to meet the hard, rigid flange which only deforms elastically. So in this case it seems that the plastic deformation may be shared between the gasket and the flanges.
Anyone have other recommendations for the situation? The 304SS line is operating at -200F and the 316SS is in corrosive services (rich amines, condensing H2S, condensing H2CO3).
My concerns are...
Will this situation produce a satisfactory seal at reasonable bolt loadings?
Will the flange continue to function if the joint has to be broken and remade with new gaskets?
Will the flange continue to function if the joint has to be broken and remade with new gaskets?
304SS and 316SS ring gaskets apparently are available at a max hardness of Rockwell-B 83 or Brinnell 160. (
ASTM A182 does not directly control hardness on F304 or F316. ASME B16.5 is no help on hardness either.
My limited understanding of gasket sealing is that the soft gasket should plastically deform to meet the hard, rigid flange which only deforms elastically. So in this case it seems that the plastic deformation may be shared between the gasket and the flanges.
Anyone have other recommendations for the situation? The 304SS line is operating at -200F and the 316SS is in corrosive services (rich amines, condensing H2S, condensing H2CO3).