constantins
Electrical
- Jul 23, 2001
- 3
I am currently analysing the process model code for a synchronous generator simulation. The model calculates the internal EMF of the machine under normal operating conditions (i.e. operating within its capability curves) as a function of the Automatic Voltage Regulator's (AVR) internal setpoint (set to 22kV for normal operation). Reactive power is calculated using the standard text book formula involving torque angle.
Once the generator's operating point falls outside its described capability curves, however, these calculations change to some abberation I do not fully understand. Briefly, Qn and EMF is calclated as:
Where En is the current EMF, Eo was the EMF when the machine became over/under excited, Qn is the current reactive power, Qo was the reactive power when the machine became over/under excited, and Qg is the grid reactive power. (!?)
My question is: does the generator's internal EMF and reactive power have to be calculated differently when the the generator is operated outside of its capability? Does the AVR have no effect on a generator operating outside of it's capability? If so, what are these calculations and what are the underlying reasons for this.
Many thanks
Constantin
Once the generator's operating point falls outside its described capability curves, however, these calculations change to some abberation I do not fully understand. Briefly, Qn and EMF is calclated as:
Code:
Qn = Qg + Qo/0.0125
En = Eo - 0.0125(Qo - Qn)
Where En is the current EMF, Eo was the EMF when the machine became over/under excited, Qn is the current reactive power, Qo was the reactive power when the machine became over/under excited, and Qg is the grid reactive power. (!?)
My question is: does the generator's internal EMF and reactive power have to be calculated differently when the the generator is operated outside of its capability? Does the AVR have no effect on a generator operating outside of it's capability? If so, what are these calculations and what are the underlying reasons for this.
Many thanks
Constantin