7016
Mechanical
- Jan 23, 2020
- 29
Details::
Stem of a gate valve has a bigger length by 24 mm.
Only 45 mm is engaging with the drive sleeve (bush) of electrical actuator. Remaining 24 mm extra length is hanging above the drive sleeve of the actuator without any engagement/support.
In other words, only 40mm key length is in engaging with keyway of drive sleeve and remaining 20mm key length is not engaged/supported. Which means, only 66% of key is engaged.
Valve Operating torque is 110 NM.
Actuator maximum output torque is 150 NM.
Please refer the attachment for better understanding.
My Limitations:
I don’t have option to change the drive sleeve. Because the actuator doesn’t support.
I must go with the existing actuator. No chance of changing the actuator.
My doubt::
Is it Okay to go ahead with 66% key engaged or does there will be any fatigue in the key in long run of usage, as it is only partially engaged? Please suggest with your experiences.
Stem of a gate valve has a bigger length by 24 mm.
Only 45 mm is engaging with the drive sleeve (bush) of electrical actuator. Remaining 24 mm extra length is hanging above the drive sleeve of the actuator without any engagement/support.
In other words, only 40mm key length is in engaging with keyway of drive sleeve and remaining 20mm key length is not engaged/supported. Which means, only 66% of key is engaged.
Valve Operating torque is 110 NM.
Actuator maximum output torque is 150 NM.
Please refer the attachment for better understanding.
My Limitations:
I don’t have option to change the drive sleeve. Because the actuator doesn’t support.
I must go with the existing actuator. No chance of changing the actuator.
My doubt::
Is it Okay to go ahead with 66% key engaged or does there will be any fatigue in the key in long run of usage, as it is only partially engaged? Please suggest with your experiences.