GeoSoil
Geotechnical
- May 5, 2012
- 5
Lately, our local jurisdiction started imposing a 250 psf live load traffic surcharge on all retaining walls supporting residential sidewalks, residential driveways,and residential parking lots, which in my professional opinion is extremely conservative when designing low-height residential and/or commercial retaining walls (mostly geogrid-reinforced modular block walls), where the traffic is light or very light. Their idea is that a truck, or heavy truck, cannot be stopped from driving on a sidewalk or a residential driveway. Further, they rely to the IBC Table 1607.1-29 which states that "Sidewalks, vehicular driveways, and yards subject to trucking" should be designed for 250 psf. The same code (1607.1-14) allows a 40 psf surcharge for passenger cars inside a garage! Please note that the 250 psf, which is the standard highway design traffic surcharge on USA highways,does include heavy traffic (i.e., trucks and tractor trailers, which are common vehicles on USA highways. Away from our local jurisdiction, many government agencies do allow the use of a reduced traffic surchrge along sidewalks, residential driveways, and residential/commercial parking lots (e.g., 100 psf, 150 psf).
For geogrid-reinforced modular/small block retaining walls (which are very common in our residential projects), the application of a 250 psf surcharge at a zero offset behind the top block results in a toppling failure for the upper rows of blocks (above the first row of geogrids, which are typically placed below the 2nd block from the top, or about 16" below the top grade). Note that placing a geogrid below the topmost block (or about 8" belowthe top grade) is not a good practice as this geogrid layer gets exposed and damaged during the construction phase of the project, in addition to having a very low overburden pressure.
Is there a way out of using a 250 psf for areas where the traffic is light or very light?
See attachment (NCMA)
For geogrid-reinforced modular/small block retaining walls (which are very common in our residential projects), the application of a 250 psf surcharge at a zero offset behind the top block results in a toppling failure for the upper rows of blocks (above the first row of geogrids, which are typically placed below the 2nd block from the top, or about 16" below the top grade). Note that placing a geogrid below the topmost block (or about 8" belowthe top grade) is not a good practice as this geogrid layer gets exposed and damaged during the construction phase of the project, in addition to having a very low overburden pressure.
Is there a way out of using a 250 psf for areas where the traffic is light or very light?
See attachment (NCMA)