Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Sym interrupting vs. Adj Sym interrupting 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

kookypedia

Electrical
Jun 9, 2016
62
Guys,
ETAP SC report has Symm KA rms and Adj. Sym KA rms and it uses M.F which,

Adj. Sym KA rms = M.F. x (Sym KA rms)

I am wondering how ETAP calculates M.F. ?

adj_yb9bvi.png


An investment in knowledge pays the best interest (Benjamin Franklin).
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I don't change any setting in the breakers and it is strange that some breakers have M.F>1 (like CB6 and CB7) and some have M.F.=1 (like CB11 and CB9)

An investment in knowledge pays the best interest (Benjamin Franklin).
 
It has to do with the types of breakers, the ratings of the breakers, and the actual system power conditions. Note that the two that are getting adjusted were tested at a more favorable power factor than the rest; they're seeing an X/R that's too high while that same X/R is fine for the breakers with the lower test PF. Try the IEEE Blue Book; the Red Book may also have some information.
 
See if the graphic and formulas below could help

MF_LV_CB_Interrupting_Duty_Cycle_xqpgdn.gif


LV_MF_Formula_jm8hko.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor