Powerman888
Electrical
- Sep 20, 2008
- 1
Using symmetrical components and looking at sequence networks (positive, negative, and zero), a 3-phase fault is said to be a balanced fault, therefore only positive sequence network applies (might think of it kind of like normal conditions, except load is "way excessive").
Now considering a 3-phase-to-ground fault (as opposed to just a 3-phase fault), would the ground be like a neutral that nominally has no current flowing through it for balanced load conditions (in this case, the balanced load being a fault that ties all 3 phases together)? That is, are we again talking about a balanced fault with only positive sequence networks applicable (and no negative sequence network and no zero sequence network)?
The answer to the question may be obvious, but never see any literature taking the time to state that a 3-phase-to-ground fault is for all practical purposes the same as a mere 3-phase fault (if that is indeed the case).
Have not looked at it in a while, but believe I recall that a 2-phase-to-ground fault "is" different from a mere 2-phase fault. So want to feel comfortable that a 3-phase-to-ground fault "is not" different from a mere 3-phase fault (again, if that is the case). Appreciate any thoughts on the matter.
Now considering a 3-phase-to-ground fault (as opposed to just a 3-phase fault), would the ground be like a neutral that nominally has no current flowing through it for balanced load conditions (in this case, the balanced load being a fault that ties all 3 phases together)? That is, are we again talking about a balanced fault with only positive sequence networks applicable (and no negative sequence network and no zero sequence network)?
The answer to the question may be obvious, but never see any literature taking the time to state that a 3-phase-to-ground fault is for all practical purposes the same as a mere 3-phase fault (if that is indeed the case).
Have not looked at it in a while, but believe I recall that a 2-phase-to-ground fault "is" different from a mere 2-phase fault. So want to feel comfortable that a 3-phase-to-ground fault "is not" different from a mere 3-phase fault (again, if that is the case). Appreciate any thoughts on the matter.