Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Synchronous Generator speed

Status
Not open for further replies.

bartb102

Electrical
Nov 21, 2006
38
We have a hydro powerhouse with 750KW 40Hz generators with 40 poles. We cannot increase the rotor speed to produce 60Hz. power. We have been told that the stator can be rewound to produce 60Hz. It seems like this would need 1.5 stator windings per rotor pole. There is only one winding per slot, so the slots are fairly shallow. It would be much easier to restack the stator core than to modify the rotor.

Has anyone tried this? Any thoughts? A vendor has said it might be possible, but has offered no details.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The c=3 means you cannot get a geometrically similar winding (three phases are carbon copies of each other, just shifted by 120 degrees). So you can't get a perfectly balanced fundamental. But considering the large number of poles, I think you can get veryclose. But still the harmonics would be a huge concern.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
I'm still concerned with the rotor.
How about cutting the number of poles in half on both the rotor and stator. Then slow the turbine down to get 60 Hz. Any solution will involve compromise and I suspect a reduction in the KVA rating.
Consider any one coil. The number of rotor poles passing in one revolution will induce a 40 Hz EMF. Changing the number of poles on the stator may result in some interesting harmonics but it won't change the frequency.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
waross 12 Oct 13 22:55 said:
I'm still concerned with the rotor....Changing the number of poles on the stator may result in some interesting harmonics but it won't change the frequency.
Yes, we are in agreement.
electricpete 10 Oct 13 9:10 said:
If you wanted to produce 60hz, you would need to rewind both your stator and rotor for 60 poles




=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
waross said:
How about cutting the number of poles in half on both the rotor and stator. Then slow the turbine down to get 60 Hz.
You’ll have to explain your logic.
Cutting poles in half would give 20 poles.
To get 60hz with a 20 pole machine would require you to operate at speed of 360rpm.
That’s going in the wrong direction.
The machine is currently operating at 120rpm and can’t exceed 140rpm


=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
I stand corrected. Sorry

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
Thanks for all the input, guys. The end result is that for 750KW, converting the generator to 60Hz. is not practical or cost effective compared to a inverter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor