RicardoPereiraGomes
Aerospace
- Jun 29, 2015
- 2
I'm working on an university project to developed a reaction wheel for a cubesat.
After defining that the minimum generated torque for the RWS is 8.8e-6 Nm and that the reaction wheels shall be able to hold an angular momentum of 4.82e-4 Nms (around the Z axis), I start computing the systemic disturbances due to the axial shaft play of the motor and the manufacturing error of the flywheel. After making some calculation I reach the conclusion that this perturbations are in the same order of magnitude as the required torque. Thus, this I've created the following upper and lower bounds in the M-n graph (Fig1) for each reaction wheel. Nevertheless, they are periodic and well defined (torque generated in the X - Y direction - Fig2), but since i`m dealing with perturbations in the same order of magnitude it will be difficult to implement a controller to deal with? If I double integrate the systemic disturbance torque during half a period I conclude that the satellite will oscillate around 4.6e-6 deg (which for our mission can be neglected). Otherwise, the sensors we are going to use have a white noise some orders of magnitude smaller than 4.5e-6 deg, thus this error due to the axial shaft play can not be neglected? Moreover, if the sampling frequency of the sensors are 1/2 smaller than frequency of the disturbance this can also be neglected, correct? I do not know yet the sensors characteristics. I really would like to check if I'm being logic and if you have any ideas about how can I start defining the controller for the motor.
Thanks,
Ricardo
After defining that the minimum generated torque for the RWS is 8.8e-6 Nm and that the reaction wheels shall be able to hold an angular momentum of 4.82e-4 Nms (around the Z axis), I start computing the systemic disturbances due to the axial shaft play of the motor and the manufacturing error of the flywheel. After making some calculation I reach the conclusion that this perturbations are in the same order of magnitude as the required torque. Thus, this I've created the following upper and lower bounds in the M-n graph (Fig1) for each reaction wheel. Nevertheless, they are periodic and well defined (torque generated in the X - Y direction - Fig2), but since i`m dealing with perturbations in the same order of magnitude it will be difficult to implement a controller to deal with? If I double integrate the systemic disturbance torque during half a period I conclude that the satellite will oscillate around 4.6e-6 deg (which for our mission can be neglected). Otherwise, the sensors we are going to use have a white noise some orders of magnitude smaller than 4.5e-6 deg, thus this error due to the axial shaft play can not be neglected? Moreover, if the sampling frequency of the sensors are 1/2 smaller than frequency of the disturbance this can also be neglected, correct? I do not know yet the sensors characteristics. I really would like to check if I'm being logic and if you have any ideas about how can I start defining the controller for the motor.
Thanks,
Ricardo