stevenal
Electrical
- Aug 20, 2001
- 3,850
Apparently it's a deal breaker for residential PV systems, so the industry has successfully lobbied against it. An NREL report can be found at
I'm truly amazed that the report can discuss utility worker safety practice with no mention of OSHA.
The various other disconnects are listed with no mention of the fact that of the eight, only the meter base is accessible (well it's supposed to be anyway) to the utility 24/7.
One item we being asked to trust is the invisible, inaccessible, relay inside the inverter. OSHA has already published an interpretation regarding the use of a similar electronic device (a PLC) for safety related functions. It can only qualify as an alternate means after an employer (utility in this case) has jumped through too many impossible hoops.
So we are back to the meter. I'm not aware that meters have ever been recognized as a suitable load break device, although they are commonly used that way. Meters are also known to pull the guts out of meter bases when extracted.
So finally to my question. How are utilities that have waived the disconnect rule, or those that are regulated by commissions that have waived the rule, obtaining the isolation required by OSHA? For example; it is determined that the terminations on the secondary bushings of the distribution transformer must be redone de-energized. The utility side is disconnected by pulling a primary fuse or elbow. System maps indicate one of the affected customers has a PV system, though. No one is home, and the sun is shining. What is your next step?
Thanks.
I'm truly amazed that the report can discuss utility worker safety practice with no mention of OSHA.
The various other disconnects are listed with no mention of the fact that of the eight, only the meter base is accessible (well it's supposed to be anyway) to the utility 24/7.
One item we being asked to trust is the invisible, inaccessible, relay inside the inverter. OSHA has already published an interpretation regarding the use of a similar electronic device (a PLC) for safety related functions. It can only qualify as an alternate means after an employer (utility in this case) has jumped through too many impossible hoops.
So we are back to the meter. I'm not aware that meters have ever been recognized as a suitable load break device, although they are commonly used that way. Meters are also known to pull the guts out of meter bases when extracted.
So finally to my question. How are utilities that have waived the disconnect rule, or those that are regulated by commissions that have waived the rule, obtaining the isolation required by OSHA? For example; it is determined that the terminations on the secondary bushings of the distribution transformer must be redone de-energized. The utility side is disconnected by pulling a primary fuse or elbow. System maps indicate one of the affected customers has a PV system, though. No one is home, and the sun is shining. What is your next step?
Thanks.