jgar1
Mechanical
- Sep 29, 2007
- 7
I am evaluating a failure of a relief valve for liquid application to lift at the required set pressure during bench testing. The valve lifted 6% high (636 psi vs. 600 psi set pressure). It is an obsolete Crosby JB-36 valve.
I read some operating experience where an engineer attributed a failure to lift (lifting high) to spring relaxation and cold working. Spring relaxation has the effect of reducing the set pressure of the spring. The theory is that adjusting the spring over time because of spring relaxation can have an opposite effect - the effect of work hardening the spring, leading to a higher required pressure to lift the valve.
Is this a well-accepted phenomena / failure cause?
It's not really that relevant, but the valve protects the high head safety injection system in a pressurized water reactor and discharges to the pressurizer relief tank.
I read some operating experience where an engineer attributed a failure to lift (lifting high) to spring relaxation and cold working. Spring relaxation has the effect of reducing the set pressure of the spring. The theory is that adjusting the spring over time because of spring relaxation can have an opposite effect - the effect of work hardening the spring, leading to a higher required pressure to lift the valve.
Is this a well-accepted phenomena / failure cause?
It's not really that relevant, but the valve protects the high head safety injection system in a pressurized water reactor and discharges to the pressurizer relief tank.