thread292-465770 For 91 material

[WE.MetE]

thread292-465770

For 91 material (all product forms), In the 2019 Edition Type 1 and Type 2 has been added to Section II, Part A, but Types 1 and Type 2 has NOT been added to Section II, Part D. What happens when the Code has caused a conflict like this? Design is stating SA-335-P1 with no Type, which is appropriate for what is listed in Part D, however QA is expecting to see Type 1 or Type 2 on the CMTR's which are reviewed to Part A.

 

[XL83NL]

This issue has been addressed and corrected in the 2021 edt. if I’m not mistaken (there was a webinar this week by IHS with highlights per section, this was mentioned too).

That may not help you as you’re on a different edition. Have you checked if this has been addressed in a Code Case for the current edition?

/edt; just noticed my proposal has been discussed in length in the thread you hyperlinked.

Huub
- You never get what you expect, you only get what you inspect.

 

[DVWE]

WE.MetE,

The design people and the QA people you refer to, have they been familiarized with the code case?

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.

 

[WE.MetE]

They are familiar with CC 2864-2, but there is still a conflict with the 2 code sections. I also had heard that there will be a change to Section II, Part D in the 2021 Edition.

 

[DVWE]

So first and foremost, let me apologize that I don't at the moment have access to 2864-2, I am not sure what is different between -2 and -1.

To your original question:

What happens when the Code has caused a conflict like this?

The answer is in the reply section of the code case 2864-1, items (g), (h), and (i).

Again, Table 1 of the code case is specifically for Type 2. So your QC personnel verifies the MTRs for Type 2 to this Table. Your Design personnel uses Table 3 for the new stress values for Type 2 that are missing in Part D.

If Type 1 is used, the code case is telling you that the chemistries shall conform to Part A, while the stress values shall conform to Part D.

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.