Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

torque-roll-axis calculation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robo25

Automotive
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
3
TRA_Calculation_zps21651c48.jpg


Good Morning All,
I am trying to calculate the torque roll axis for a powertrain system. After some research I know that the the calculation is only dependent on the moment of inertia and also after further research I have come across multiple papers from Singh (and referenced by almost everyone) which is the photo listed above. I have created some matlab code in trying to calculate the TRA direction but don't seem to be obtaining the right values. I was wondering if anyone could tell me where I am going wrong or have any other reference that I could perhaps follow.

I have the following inertia matrix (M_theta):

I=[2.519 4.458 4.409 -.1678 .5385 -.0947];

and should receive TRA_Direction as: [0 0 0 .992113 .0347851 .120426] but I do not. Is there anything that I am missing here when normalizing the first column or taking the inverse?

function[TRA_Direction]= TRA_Direction(I)
% User Input
% I: Moment of Inertia Matrix expressed as [Ixx,Iyy,Izz,Ixy,Ixz,Iyz]
%
% Output
% TRA_Direction: The Direction of the TRA
%Mass Inertia Matrix
M_Theta=zeros(3,3);
M_Theta(1,1)=I(1);
M_Theta(1,2)=-I(4);
M_Theta(1,3)=-I(5);
M_Theta(2,1)=-I(4);
M_Theta(2,2)=I(2);
M_Theta(2,3)=-I(6);
M_Theta(3,1)=-I(5);
M_Theta(3,2)=-I(6);
M_Theta(3,3)=I(3);
Inv_M_Theta=inv(M_Theta);
a=norm([Inv_M_Theta(1,1) Inv_M_Theta(2,1) Inv_M_Theta(3,1)]);
Torque_Axis=[1 0 0];
Theta_TRA=a*Inv_M_Theta*Torque_Axis';
TRA_Direction=[0 0 0 Theta_TRA']';
 
Rather than jumping straight to a solution, have you checked that your script agrees with obvious cases of the M matrix, such as Ixy=Iyz=Izx=0, where the solution is obvious by inspection?

It seems to me there are four broad possibilities for error

1) Singh is wrong

2)your mental interpretation of Singh is wrong

3)your matlab interpretation of 2) is wrong

4)your example is wrong (I am confused to see both positive and -ve cross terms)

I'd add that in practice ignoring the contribution of the powertrain mounts is a bit odd.



Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
Thank you GregLocok for responding to my thread. For your second reply I have broke the inertia tensor down into the principal moments and principal axis and have obtained the same values as from the above code. I will have to look more into everything still.
Thank you though,
Mel
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top